Earth Intelligence Network

About Transpartisanship

BiPartisanship, as Peter Peterson documents so elegantly in his book, Running on Empty, has destroyed the Republic because it is a two-party spoils system that excludes all other parties and their own mavericks, and eschews accountability and transparency.

Non-Partisanship, the preferred term among the business elite, suggests a draconian reduction in the role of any political party at any level, and focuses instead on creating a universal platform that can connect dots to dots, dots to people, and people to people--all with the appropriate visualization and monetization so that multicultural consensus can be achived across a range of non-partisan choices.

Transpartisanship retains a focus on the political parties and calls for all parties to be included in the political process. This does, however, leave the "party" as an intermediary between the people and the policy process, and this is one reason why elements of the right are beginning to consider this term too far to the left.

Did you know that the League of Women Voters was displaced by a new Republican-Democratic Commission to manage the presidential debates and exclude all third, fourth, and fifth party candidates, the way FOX is excluding Ron Paul in New Hampshire?

We the People have been aroused. Now is the time for each citizen to familiarize themselves with the concepts of Non-Partisanship and Transpartisanship, and the 52 tough questions, the book reviews, and the strategic concept we have devised for providing free public intelligence in the public interest.

» Don Beck on Bipartisan versus Transpartisan
» Reuniting America (110 million) on Transpartisanship
» Reuniting America Democracy Campaign
» Wikipedia Transpartisan Page
» Jim Turner (Naderite #2) on Integral Politics & Transpartisanship
01B Big Picture Memorandum with Appendices.doc
02A Synopsis of New Progressives.doc
02B New Political Compass (Paul Ray, 7.4), 22 Pages.doc